Mike Braun said Tuesday’s vote “pretty well calcifies what the feeling would be on our side.” “I’m not going to grant jurisdiction because something bad happened.”Īnd Indiana Republican Sen. So that didn’t ring my bell,” Graham said. And I thought that the House managers tried to make jurisdiction an impassioned decision. “I mean, it took a long time to get wrapped into the meat of the question. Lindsey Graham said something like that wasn’t going to change his mind, and neither would video of the scenes of the mob violence in and around the Capitol. “Now if I’m an impartial juror, and one side is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror, I’m going to vote for the side that did the good job,” Cassidy said.īut South Carolina Sen. And when they talked about it, they kind of glided over it, almost as if they were embarrassed of their arguments,” Cassidy said after the vote. They did everything they could but to talk about the question at hand. “President Trump’s team was disorganized. The same five Republicans who joined Democrats then also voted to continue the trial this week, as did Louisiana Republican Sen. The Senate voted mostly along party lines, 56-44, that it had jurisdiction to conduct the trial, despite bipartisan agreement that the argument from Trump’s defense team was a mess, but it showed how House managers have a tough task to convince enough Republican senators to convict Trump on a charge of inciting that insurrection.Ī week earlier, the Senate had voted almost exactly the same way on a procedural motion about its jurisdiction. “We just saw it in the most astonishing way - we lived through it,” Raskin said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |